ArticleCrop health2025
Wound-induced transcriptional dynamics in rice.
Article in Crop health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Herbivore attacks or some pathogen infections typically begin with wounding of plant tissues, yet the transcriptional dynamics of wound-induced responses in the monocot rice remain incompletely understood. Here, we conducted a time-series transcriptome analysis of mechanically wounded rice leaves. Temporal expression patterns were observed even in untreated plants, particularly at dusk. To identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs), we compared wounded and unwounded (control) plants at corresponding time points. Jasmonate-related genes, including 18 biosynthetic and 13 catabolic genes, were significantly up-regulated. Consistently, jasmonic acid (JA) and jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine were rapidly accumulated in wounded tissues within 1 h, followed by JA catabolites after 3 h. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis of upregulated DEGs revealed early- and late-responsive gene modules. Early-expressed genes included putative regulators such as transcription factors, kinases, abscisic acid pathway components, and small peptide-coding genes, while late-responsive genes were primarily involved in specialized metabolite biosynthesis (e.g., phenylpropanoids). Targeted metabolomic analysis showed that most phenolamides were highly accumulated in wounded leaves, whereas flavonoid levels were decreased, likely due to altered metabolic flux in the phenylpropanoid pathway. Comparative analysis of leaf folder (LF) larvae- and wound-induced transcriptomes revealed that only 42% of wound-upregulated DEGs responded to LF feeding, suggesting that LF larvae partially suppress wound responses in rice. This study provides a valuable resource for understanding wound-associated biotic stress responses in rice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.