ArticleResearch in health services & regions2026
The effect of general practitioners' sex and age on patients' healthcare utilization: a Norwegian registry study.
Article in Research in health services & regions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to estimate the associations of general practitioner (GP) sex and age with patients’ use of specialist and out-of-hours healthcare services in Norway, using a quasi-experimental design that leverages patient assignment to a GP to reduce bias from patient-GP matching.
methodsUsing national registry data on 1,884,665 adult patients assigned to a GP from 2008 to 2021, we exploited quasi-random assignment of patients to GPs to estimate the associations of the assigned GP’s sex or age with patient healthcare utilization in the three years after assignment. Poisson regression analyses were used for binary outcomes (contact/no contact), and linear regressions for continuous measures (number of contact days) of healthcare utilization, each with multi-level fixed effects to adjust for confounding. Analyses were stratified by patient groups defined by history of mental health diagnosis.
resultsGP sex and age generally had small or null associations with healthcare utilization. A small negative association was observed for non-acute outpatient mental and somatic healthcare, but this was not consistent across groups defined by mental health diagnostic history. GP sex or age showed no consistent associations with other outcomes.
conclusionAs the GP workforce undergoes demographic changes—with an increasing share of younger and female physicians—these results suggest that such characteristics are unlikely to be strongly associated with individual patients’ use of specialist or out-of-hours mental and somatic healthcare services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.