Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41649621›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular neurobiology2026

CRISPR-Based Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: A Narrative Review.

Firoozeh Alavian, Setayesh Ghasemi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Firoozeh AlavianDepartment of Biology Education, Farhangian University, PO Box 889-14665, Tehran, Iran. f.alavian@cfu.ac.ir.
Setayesh GhasemiExperimental Science Education, Fatemeh Zahra Isfahan Campus, Shahid Rajaee Higher Education Center, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic stroke (IS) is one of the most common neurological diseases worldwide and is caused by the blockage of cerebral blood vessels, leading to reduced blood flow and neuronal damage. Given the limitations of existing treatments, CRISPR gene-editing technology has emerged as a promising strategy to precisely target the molecular pathways underlying IS pathophysiology. By enabling intervention in genes regulating inflammation, apoptosis, and repair, CRISPR enables more precise and effective therapies. Various CRISPR delivery systems, including viral vectors, nanocarriers, and extracellular vesicles, play crucial roles in the effective access of this tool to neural cells. Studies have shown that the use of CRISPR-Cas9 to modulate key pathogenic pathways, including those governing inflammation, oxidative stress, and cell death, can prevent neuronal damage and improve neurological function. Additionally, targeting ncRNAs and RNA methylation with CRISPR-based systems plays a role in regulating oxidative stress and stress granule formation. The use of CRISPR to modulate cell communication and organelle transfer and correct mitochondrial mutations has also been considered a neuroprotective mechanism. Despite persistent challenges in targeted and safe delivery, substantial preclinical advances, primarily in rodent models, underscore the potential for CRISPR-based therapies to transform future stroke treatment. These findings suggest that CRISPR-based strategies could evolve into precision neurotherapeutics that address root molecular pathologies, potentially complementing or surpassing current stroke interventions.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenetic TherapyIschemic StrokeAnimalsHumansBBB repairCRISPRCRISPR-CasRxGene editingIschemic strokeNecroptosisNeuroinflammationNeuroprotectionRNA editingStroke gene therapy

Identifiers

PMID41649621
PMCPMC12920813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.