Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41649617›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2026

Addressing colorectal cancer screening gaps in Uruguay: a health literacy perspective.

Lydia P Buki, Micaela Reich, John M Abbamonte, Robert K Sommer, Selva Sanabia, Dolores Larrosa, Bibiana Sologaistoa, Mercedes Blanco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lydia P BukiDepartment of Educational and Psychological Studies, University of Miami, 5202 University Drive, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA. l.buki@miami.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5362-1511
Micaela ReichDepartamento de Bienestar y Salud, Universidad Católica del Uruguay, Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6568-6945
John M Abbamonte, Wall Township, NJ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8481-8242
Robert K SommerDepartment of Educational and Psychological Studies, University of Miami, 5202 University Drive, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5706-3019
Selva SanabiaArea de Educación Poblacional, Comisión Honoraria de Lucha Contra el Cáncer, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Dolores LarrosaArea de Educación Poblacional, Comisión Honoraria de Lucha Contra el Cáncer, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Bibiana SologaistoaArea de Educación Poblacional, Comisión Honoraria de Lucha Contra el Cáncer, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Mercedes BlancoArea de Educación Poblacional, Comisión Honoraria de Lucha Contra el Cáncer, Montevideo, Uruguay.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUruguay has the highest colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality rate in the world, given the high prevalence of risk factors and low screening rates. Despite national guidelines recommending regular FIT screening between the ages of 50 and 74, less than half of the eligible population has obtained the test. Clearly, efforts are needed to increase screening rates. Little is known, however, about factors that promote FIT uptake among Uruguayans. To address this research gap, a theoretical analysis was conducted based on the health literacy model, to understand the relative contribution of individual and organizational health literacy variables in screening behaviors.

methodThrough community-based outreach, a national sample of 398 Uruguayan women and men was recruited. Participants had never been diagnosed with CRC and were 50 to 74 years of age, consistent with national screening guidelines.

resultsAnalyses showed that when examining individual health literacy, knowledge of cancer more generally, and of CRC in particular, had the largest predictive value. However, when adding organizational health literacy variables to the model, recommendation by a health care provider yielded odds of screening 210 times higher.

conclusionThe dramatic effect of a provider's recommendation has important implications for future theory building, research, and practice. Additionally, this study supports the use of a health literacy conceptualization to understand predictors of cancer screening in Uruguay.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedUruguayCancer controlColorectal neoplasmsEarly detectionInternationalLatin AmericaPsycho-oncology

Identifiers

PMID41649617
PMCPMC12881165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.