ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2026
Addressing colorectal cancer screening gaps in Uruguay: a health literacy perspective.
Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeUruguay has the highest colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality rate in the world, given the high prevalence of risk factors and low screening rates. Despite national guidelines recommending regular FIT screening between the ages of 50 and 74, less than half of the eligible population has obtained the test. Clearly, efforts are needed to increase screening rates. Little is known, however, about factors that promote FIT uptake among Uruguayans. To address this research gap, a theoretical analysis was conducted based on the health literacy model, to understand the relative contribution of individual and organizational health literacy variables in screening behaviors.
methodThrough community-based outreach, a national sample of 398 Uruguayan women and men was recruited. Participants had never been diagnosed with CRC and were 50 to 74 years of age, consistent with national screening guidelines.
resultsAnalyses showed that when examining individual health literacy, knowledge of cancer more generally, and of CRC in particular, had the largest predictive value. However, when adding organizational health literacy variables to the model, recommendation by a health care provider yielded odds of screening 210 times higher.
conclusionThe dramatic effect of a provider's recommendation has important implications for future theory building, research, and practice. Additionally, this study supports the use of a health literacy conceptualization to understand predictors of cancer screening in Uruguay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.