Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41649594›Full record

ArticleArchives of women's mental health2026

Perinatal depression screening and diagnosis: Identifying opportunities to improve optimal care.

Kelli Ryckman, Maiti Peters, Erik Parker, Lilian Golzarri-Arroyo, DeShauna Jones, Morolake Adeagbo, Jaime Hamil, Beth Shelton, Hyunkeun Cho, Karen Tabb and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of women's mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kelli RyckmanIndiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, United States. kryckman@iu.edu.
Maiti PetersUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, United States.
Erik ParkerIndiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, United States.
Lilian Golzarri-ArroyoIndiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, United States.
DeShauna JonesUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, United States.
Morolake AdeagboUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, United States.
Jaime HamilNorthwestern University, Evanston, United States.
Beth SheltonUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States.
Hyunkeun ChoUniversity of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States.
Karen TabbUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States.
S Darius TandonNorthwestern University, Evanston, United States.
Elissa FaroUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, United States.

Funding

Can an Evidence-Based Mental Health Intervention be Implemented into Preexisting Home Visiting Programs using Implementation Facilitation?R01MH134474 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Elissa Z Faro, KELLI K. RYCKMAN · 2024 to 2026
$2.4M
NIH HHS MH134474NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH134474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePerinatal depression (PND), occurring during pregnancy or within the first year after childbirth, is a common medical complication with serious consequences when left untreated, including hospitalizations, increased morbidity, and suicide. This study examined the intersection among racial, ethnic, and sociodemographic disparities in PND screening and diagnosis within a Midwestern health system.

methodsWe performed a multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA) using electronic health record data for 79,992 deliveries. The study included women aged 15-50 who delivered live-born infants between 22 and 44 weeks of gestation. PND screening was identified by the presence of a PHQ-9 or EPDS score, and ICD9/10 codes were used to define depression diagnosis within one year before or after delivery.

resultsAcross groups older women (≥ 36 years) were less likely to be screened for PND (OR = 0.65; 95%CI = 0.56-0.75) but not less likely to be diagnosed. Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and Asian women were more likely to receive PND screening (ORs = 1.23-1.31) but less likely to be diagnosed (ORs = 0.16-0.60) compared to Non-Hispanic White women. Enrollment in public insurance was not associated with PND screening but was linked to a higher likelihood of diagnosis (OR = 1.41, CI = 1.24-1.61). Women in rural areas were less likely to be screened for PND (OR = 0.66, CI = 0.58-0.75), with no significant association with diagnosis.

conclusionsSignificant disparities exist in PND screening and diagnosis. Groups facing historic structural inequities are more likely to be screened but less likely to receive a diagnosis, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to address these inequities.

Indexed as

DepressionDepression, PostpartumHealthcare DisparitiesMass ScreeningPregnancy ComplicationsAdolescentAdultAsianBlack or African AmericanElectronic Health RecordsEthnicityFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMiddle AgedPerinatal CareDiagnosisDisparitiesIntersectionalityPerinatal depressionScreening

Identifiers

PMID41649594
PMCPMC12881009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.