SynthesisClinical and experimental medicine2026
In vitro assays as a tool to personalize treatment in central nervous system tumors: a systematic literature review.
Synthesis in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Personalized therapy in neuro-oncology has traditionally relied on molecular profiling. However, clinical benefit has been scarce to date. Recently, in vitro drug sensitivity testing using patient-derived models-such as organoids and cell lines-has emerged as a promising strategy. We systematically reviewed evidence on the efficacy of in vitro drug screening in predicting treatment outcome for brain tumors, including but not limited to glioblastoma. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Fifteen studies were included, comprising 300 patients overall. Cohort studies built the largest group; only one randomized clinical trial was found. In vitro assays, using patient-derived stem cells, standardized assays ad the ChemoID, or tumor-derived organoids, were able to reliably predict treatment outcome. However, the overall quality of evidence was limited. These models may overcome limitations of molecular profiling, especially in glioblastoma, where driver mutations are often lacking and the molecular profile evolves at recurrence. Although initial results are promising, further validation is needed before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.