SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Clopidogrel versus aspirin monotherapy following dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated meta-analysis of 162,829 patients.
Synthesis in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains a cornerstone for preventing ischemic events; however, the optimal long-term single antiplatelet therapy after completion of DAPT remains unclear. We aimed to compare clopidogrel and aspirin monotherapy after completion of the standard duration of DAPT.
methodsA systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to April 2025. We included randomized clinical trials and observational studies that compared aspirin versus clopidogrel monotherapy after completion of standard-duration DAPT. The primary and co-primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleeding, respectively. Using random-effects models, outcomes were expressed as risk ratios (RR) or hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsTen studies, comprising 162,829 patients, were included. Clopidogrel was significantly associated with a lower risk of MACE (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.66–0.79) and net adverse clinical events (NACE) (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.73–0.99) at a weighted mean follow-up of 3.2 years. Major bleeding showed no significant difference between clopidogrel and aspirin (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.60–1.21). Moreover, there was no difference between clopidogrel and aspirin in all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularization, stroke, or all bleeding.
conclusionAmong patients who underwent PCI, clopidogrel monotherapy after standard DAPT was associated with a lower incidence of MACE and NACE compared with aspirin monotherapy, without increasing the bleeding risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.