ReviewSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026
Variant popliteus tendon anatomy in knee surgery: implications for imaging, biomechanics, and operative strategy.
Review in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MRI morphometry of the popliteus tendon and lateral meniscus in an Iraqi adult cohort.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe popliteus tendon (PLT) exhibits considerable anatomical variability with direct implications for surgical procedures involving the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee. This review aims to translate the morphological classification proposed by Olewnik et al. (Sci Rep 11:14434, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93778-5 ) into a clinically oriented framework for orthopaedic and sports surgeons, integrating imaging, biomechanical, and procedural perspectives.
methodsA comprehensive synthesis of anatomical, radiological, and surgical literature was performed, structured around the four primary PLT types and ten subtypes defined by Olewnik et al. (Sci Rep 11:14434, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93778-5 ). Surgical risks, imaging features (MRI and ultrasound), and biomechanical consequences were analysed. Case-based models and operative recommendations were formulated based on variant morphology.
resultsEach PLT variant demonstrates distinct surgical relevance. Accessory bands especially in Types IIe and IVe pose a risk of misidentification, iatrogenic injury, and graft misplacement. MRI and dynamic ultrasound are complementary tools for preoperative mapping. A structured surgical algorithm, imaging protocol, and educational recommendations were developed. Clinical scenarios underscore the importance of intraoperative recognition.
conclusionThe Olewnik classification provides a reliable anatomical roadmap with direct clinical applicability. Integrating PLT variant identification into preoperative imaging and intraoperative decision-making enhances safety, optimises graft positioning, and supports anatomical restoration. Further biomechanical and surgical validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41649560What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.