ArticleAnnals of hematology2026
Real-world outcomes of SLiM-only multiple myeloma: Korean Multicenter Retrospective analysis (KMM2401 study).
Article in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the 2014 update, SLiM biomarkers were included into the "myeloma defining events" as these markers were shown to be significantly associated with early progression to active multiple myeloma (MM). However, several subsequent studies have reported more favorable outcomes. To further clarify the clinical implications, we conducted a retrospective analysis. Patients diagnosed with MM based solely on SLiM biomarkers (SLiM-only MM) 8-17were included. Patients were analyzed according to whether they underwent active observation (group 1) or immediate treatment (group 2). From 2011 to 2023, 72 cases were collected from 8 tertiary institutes in Korea. The median age was 65, and 40 (56%) were male. In terms of the SLiM criteria, 27 patients had bone marrow plasma cell(BMPC) ≥ 60%, 31 patients had serum free light chain ratio (FLCr) ≥ 100, and 35 patients had > 1 focal lesion on MRI. Thirty-five patients were included in group 1, and the median time to progression to MM was 75.8 months. Regardless of the fulfilled SLiM criteria, patients exhibited lower 2-year risk of progression to MM compared with previous studies. Patients with > 1 focal lesion on MRI showed significantly lower 2-year risk of progression than those with BMPC ≥ 60% or FLCr ≥ 100 (p = 0.014). In group 2, the estimated median PFS was 56.8 months. Patients with SLiM-only MM exhibited an extended TTP without treatment compared to prior studies, particularly those with > 1 focal lesions on MRI. In addition, the first-line treatment resulted in favorable outcomes, which may support the benefit of earlier initiation of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.