ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2026
[Real-life data of the IVI interval after switching to faricimab therapy].
Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME), intravitreal injection (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents currently represents the standard of care. Both treatment intervals and the choice of the optimal agent are critical determinants of therapeutic outcomes.
objectiveThis study evaluated the effect of switching from established anti-VEGF agents (ranibizumab, bevacizumab or aflibercept) to faricimab on injection intervals in patients with nAMD or DME. MATERIAL AND
methodsData were collected in a routine outpatient ophthalmology practice. Inclusion criteria were: (I) treatment according to a treat-and-extend protocol, (II) at least six intravitreal injections prior to switching to faricimab and (III) at least three subsequent faricimab injections. To assess disease-specific effects, patients were stratified into nAMD and DME subgroups.
resultsA total of 86 patients with a mean of 37 prior injections were included. The mean injection interval before switching to faricimab was 44 days. In the nAMD subgroup (n = 74, mean age 72 years), the interval significantly increased from 46 to 53 days (mean difference 7.45 days, p < 0.05). In the DME subgroup (n = 12, mean age 65 years), the interval significantly increased from 42 to 57 days (mean difference 15.25 days, p < 0.05). The effect size was moderate (Cohen's d = 0.56) with high statistical power (99.93%).
conclusionSwitching to faricimab resulted in a significant extension of treatment intervals in both indications, with patients with DME deriving the greatest benefit. Limitations include the small sample size and potential selection bias. These findings suggest an improved benefit-risk profile through reduced injection frequency. Additional real-world data and meta-analyses may help identify biomarkers to further individualize anti-VEGF therapy in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41649508What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.