ArticleNeuroradiology2026
Computer-aided assessment of intracranial arterial tortuosity as a predictor of aneurysm occurrence and instability.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the associations between computer-aided multi-parametric tortuosity indexes and the occurrence and instability of intracranial aneurysms (IAs), and to explore the independence of these associations.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 705 patients (female: 64.1%, age: 58.58 ± 11.69) who underwent intracranial Computed Tomography Angiography, comprising 235 unstable aneurysm patients, 235 stable aneurysm patients, and 235 healthy controls. Computer-aided analysis quantified relative length (RL), triangular index (TI), and mean curvature (κmean) in bilateral internal carotid arteries (ICAs) and middle cerebral arteries (MCAs). Univariate analysis compared tortuosity parameters within/between groups, and multivariate analysis evaluated independence.
resultsCompared with the non-aneurysm side, the ICA aneurysm-bearing side had a higher TI (p = 0.005) at the C6, and a higher RL (p = 0.004), TI (p = 0.003), and κmean (p = 0.009) at the C7. Compared with the healthy arteries from control subjects, the C6 of the ICA aneurysm-bearing arteries had higher κmean (p = 0.002), the C7 had higher TI (p < 0.001) and κmean (p < 0.001), aneurysm-bearing MCAs had higher TI (p < 0.001) and κmean (p = 0.004). Compared with arteries with stable aneurysms, the aneurysm-bearing ICAs in the unstable group had higher TI (p = 0.001) and κmean (p = 0.039), and the aneurysm-bearing MCAs had higher TI (p = 0.044). Multivariate analysis showed that TI (p < 0.001, OR = 4.63) was an independent risk factor for ICA aneurysm instability.
conclusionsIncreased intracranial arterial tortuosity is associated with the occurrence and instability of IAs. TI of the aneurysm-bearing arteries is an independent risk factor for the instability of ICA aneurysms. TI tends to have a higher sensitivity than RL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41649505What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.