ArticleThe oncologist2026
Efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors in locally advanced breast cancer.
Article in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant treatment for hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer remains limited, particularly for tumors that are insensitive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study aims to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy combined with CDK4/6 inhibitors to that of traditional neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 49 patients receiving neoadjuvant endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6 inhibitors and 210 receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to assess tumor responses every 2-3 cycles of treatment. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics.
resultsBoth before and after PSM, the objective response rate (ORR) in the endocrine therapy group was comparable to that of the traditional chemotherapy group. After matching, the ORR was 64.6% (95% CI, 49.5-77.8) in the endocrine group and 56.3% (95% CI, 41.2-70.5) in the chemotherapy group (P = .532). A higher proportion of patients in the endocrine group achieved a pathological complete or near-complete response (Miller-Payne grades 4-5, 13.5% vs 10.4%) and post-treatment Ki67 < 5%, indicating a potential long-term benefit. Patients with ≥30% regression in maximal tumor diameter after 2 cycles of chemotherapy were considered chemotherapy sensitive. Among patients with tumors less sensitive to chemotherapy, sequential treatment with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6 inhibitors significantly improved ORR (61.8% vs 32.4%, P = .028) and was associated with greater Ki67 reduction and improved Miller-Payne grades.
conclusionNeoadjuvant endocrine therapy is a promising alternative for HR-positive breast cancer, especially for patients with poor responses to chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.