ArticleMedical and veterinary entomology2026
Mosquito and arbovirus surveillance in wetlands of South-East England: Comparison of two adult mosquito traps, use of a novel trap with FTA™ cards and arbovirus testing.
Article in Medical and veterinary entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparative assessment of mosquito trapping methods for vector surveillance in Scotland.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Mosquito and arbovirus surveillance in wetlands of South-East England: Comparison of two adult mosquito traps, use of a novel trap with FTA™ cards and arbovirus testing.Medical and veterinary entomology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective surveillance of mosquito populations is critical to monitoring and mitigating the spread of mosquito-borne diseases (MBDs). This study evaluated the relative trapping efficiency of two widely used adult mosquito traps-the Biogents BG-Sentinel (BGS) and the Mosquito Magnet® Executive (MM)-on British mosquitoes across four wetlands in south-east England over a 12-week period. A third trap, a Box-Gravid trap fitted with an FTA™ card, was deployed to detect arboviruses such as West Nile virus (WNV) via saliva collection. A total of 11,584 adult female mosquitoes representing 15 species were collected. The MM trap captured a significantly higher total number of mosquitoes, while the BGS trap demonstrated greater species evenness and was significantly more effective at catching Culex (Culex) pipiens L., 1758. Spatial variation strongly influenced catch rates, with significant differences between wetlands. No evidence of WNV was detected in any mosquito pools or FTA™ cards. While both trap types yielded similar species richness, the MM trap may be optimal for collecting large sample sizes of mammalophagic species, whereas the BGS is better suited for capturing enzootic vectors such as Culex pipiens s.l., and a broader spectrum of species. These findings provide evidence-based recommendations for future UK wetland surveillance and enhance preparedness for emerging vector-borne disease risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.