ArticleDrug and alcohol review2026
Client Experiences of a Telephone-Delivered Intervention for Methamphetamine Use Disorder.
Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Client Experiences of a Telephone-Delivered Intervention for Methamphetamine Use Disorder.Drug and alcohol review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDespite the significant harms associated with methamphetamine use both in Australia and globally, treatment uptake remains low. Telephone-delivered interventions have potential to overcome many barriers to help-seeking; however, their utility for treatment of methamphetamine use disorder is not well understood. This study explored the experiences and perceived impacts of a standalone, telephone-delivered cognitive and behavioural intervention, Ready2Change, for individuals with methamphetamine use disorder.
methodsIn-depth semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted and analysed using Framework Analysis.
resultsTwenty-seven participants (mean age = 42.0 years, standard deviation = 10.7, range 27-63) completed an interview. Four major themes arose: (i) Therapeutic connection experienced via telephone; (ii) Telephone format promoting comfort; (iii) Accessing treatment anywhere, anytime; and (iv) Treatment gains via telephone. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsEvidence of therapeutic relationships was found in participant accounts of experiencing non-judgemental support from counsellors. However, some participants reported in-person treatment would create a stronger therapeutic relationship. Many participants described a sense of comfort the telephone format afforded them, permitting anonymity and facilitating openness. Participants reported the telephone modality to be highly accessible and convenient, particularly for those with multiple commitments. Participants reported various benefits, including greater insight regarding their methamphetamine use and reduced methamphetamine use. Contrastingly, some participants felt their use was too severe and complex to be treated via telephone. Telephone-delivered interventions represent a potentially valuable initial step in the treatment trajectory for people with methamphetamine use disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.