Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41649237›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences2026

A Single-Item Screening Tool for the Assessment of Hoarding: Preliminary Observations.

Peter S Pressman, Julia Schaffer, Kelly Finch, Francesca Dino, Christopher M Filley, David B Arciniegas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peter S PressmanBehavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.ORCID 0000-0003-1760-1286
Julia SchafferBehavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Kelly FinchBehavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Francesca DinoBehavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Christopher M FilleyBehavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
David B ArciniegasBehavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.

Funding

Computational Speech Analysis in Alzheimer's Disease and Other Neurocognitive Disorders (Supplement)K23AG063900 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI PRESSMAN, PETER SCOTT · 2020 to 2024
$980k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG063900NIA NIH HHS L30 AG064745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHoarding disorder is defined as persistent difficulty discarding or parting with possessions, regardless of their actual value. Hoarding is associated with biopsychosocial distress and reduced quality of life, and although it is often associated with obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, hoarding is also encountered in cases of neurodegeneration. Assessments of hoarding behavior traditionally involve a comprehensive evaluation that may be challenging in clinical settings. The authors developed a simplified hoarding screen for patients with neurobehavioral disorders.

methodsThe Single-Item Hoarding Screen (SIHS) is a single-item questionnaire. In total, 135 patients from the University of Colorado Behavioral Neurology Clinic were surveyed; caregivers filled out the SIHS. Patients' diagnoses included a range of neurobehavioral disorders, including Alzheimer's disease, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, Lewy body dementia, primary progressive aphasia, major neurocognitive disorder not otherwise specified, and minor neurocognitive disorder not otherwise specified.

resultsThe mean age of the patients was 70.9 years, and 39% were female. Among the patients surveyed, 10% and 13% of caregivers (23% total) answered yes and maybe, respectively, to the question on the SIHS. Yes responses on this screen were significantly associated with higher scores on the established Hoarding Rating Scale, compared with maybe responses. Statistical analyses revealed significant correlations between hoarding behaviors and neuropsychiatric symptom severity as well as caregiver well-being.

conclusionsThese results suggest the potential benefits of a tool containing only a single item to screen for hoarding behavior in neurobehavioral disorders. Future research may focus on refining and validating the SIHS.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s DiseaseFrontotemporal DementiaHoardingNeurodegenerationSingle-Item Hoarding Screen

Identifiers

PMID41649237
PMCPMC13228794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.