ReviewKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026
Management of first-time shoulder dislocations: A survey of sport medicine physician perceptions.
Review in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to survey sport medicine physicians globally to evaluate how they treat patients with a first-time shoulder dislocation (FTSD), specifically exploring the most common management strategies, the evidence or guidelines guiding these decisions, and the influence of demographic factors on these strategies and perceptions.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was developed and distributed globally from 14 October 2024 through 22 March 2025 to sport medicine physicians involved in the management of shoulder instability. The questionnaire assessed respondents' demographics, preferred management strategies for FTSDs, and perceptions regarding the evidence supporting various treatment approaches. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, and regression analyses were conducted to explore associations between demographic variables and management practices and perceptions.
resultsA total of 326 respondents completed the survey, predominantly fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons from North America and Europe. The most common management strategy was immobilization for 1-3 weeks, followed by physical therapy incorporating strengthening and proprioception exercises. Imaging practices varied geographically, with North American respondents preferring radiographic assessment and Europeans favouring magnetic resonance imaging at initial presentation. Surgical management or consideration for surgical intervention was most influenced by the presence of bony injury (81%), patient age (69%) and participation in contact sports (63%). Younger physicians favoured arthroscopic stabilization, while older respondents leaned towards open approaches.
conclusionWhile variability in the management of FTSDs persists, the results of this study demonstrate emerging trends towards consensus on critical factors for consideration in the management of such patients. However, despite the prevalence of guideline-based management, a substantial proportion of respondents, particularly those over 55 years old, continue to base their practices on personal experience and training rather than standardized protocols. The development and dissemination of evidence-based guidelines remain essential to standardize clinical practices and optimize patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.