ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026
Machine learning model identifies tibial anatomical variables as potential risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MRI-Based Knee Morphometry and Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Machine Learning Case-Control Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe tibial slope is a well-known risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. As machine learning continues to progress, it has become an increasingly explored tool for clinical screening and risk factor analysis. This study aims to develop and validate a prognostic machine learning model to predict the outcome of ACL injury from tibial anatomic parameters and identify the most predictive features.
methodsA pre-published dataset of coronal, medial and lateral tibial slopes and medial tibial depth was constructed using magnetic resonance imaging scans taken from 104 subjects (44 males: 22 injured, 22 uninjured; 60 females: 27 injured, 33 uninjured). The dataset was split into train-validation and test sets to ensure robust model evaluation. AutoGluon-enabled machine learning models, including XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, TabPFN, TabM, TabICL, MITRA and their weighted ensembles were trained and tuned with respect to the F2-score across ten different random seeds. Two instances of the best-performing model were developed: a default tested model (weighted ensemble from the default seed of 42) and a full-dataset model (weighted ensemble retrained on the entire dataset). Global SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis was used to elucidate the most predictive features, and local SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis to provide interpretability for individual predictions.
resultsThe default tested model achieved a 73.60% validation F2-score. On the test set, it demonstrated a 95.44% test balanced accuracy, 95.24% F1-score, 98.04% F2-score, 100% ROC AUC, 90.91% precision and 100% recall. The full-dataset model achieved an 81.30% validation F2-score. The relative importance of tibial anatomical features were identified.
conclusionsOverall, the study presented two prognostic models with moderately high predictive power to identify subjects with high likelihood of ACL injury. Decreased medial tibial depth along with increased medial and lateral tibial slopes were reported as top predictors for ACL injury. These models can potentially be integrated into clinical practice to assist clinicians in predicting the likelihood of ACL injury, but require external validation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.