ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Bioprinting of Microtissues Within Mechanically Tunable Support Baths to Engineer Anisotropic Musculoskeletal Tissues.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From microtissues to macro solutions - The future of scalable and automated cartilage tissue engineering.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Rebuilding the degenerative disc microenvironment: mesenchymal stem cells, exosomes, and bioengineered scaffolds.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bioprinting is a powerful tool for engineering living grafts, however replicating the composition, structure and function of native tissues remains a major challenge. During morphogenesis, cellular self-organization and matrix development are strongly influenced by the mechanical constraints provided by surrounding tissues, suggesting that such biophysical cues should be integrated into bioprinting strategies to engineer more biomimetic grafts. Here, we introduce a novel bioprinting platform that spatially patterns mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (MSC)-derived microtissues into mechanically tunable support baths. By modulating the bath's mechanical properties, we can precisely control the physical constraints applied post-printing, directing both filament geometry and cellular behavior. Support bath stiffness regulated mechano-sensitive gene expression and microtissue phenotype, with softer matrices favoring chondrogenesis and stiffer environments promoting (myo)fibrogenic differentiation. In addition, the physical properties of the non-degradable support bath modulated microtissue fusion and extracellular matrix organization, with increased collagen fiber alignment in stiffer baths. Leveraging these findings, it was possible to engineer either articular cartilage, meniscus, or ligament grafts with user-defined collagen architectures by simply varying the physical properties of the support bath. This platform establishes a foundation for bioprinting structurally anisotropic and phenotypically distinct constructs, thereby enabling the scalable engineering of a range of different musculoskeletal tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.