Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41649143›Full record

ArticleClinical dysmorphology2026

A case with a de novo chromosome 8.9 Mb 11pter duplication and 6.4 Mb 11qter deletion derived from a father with a normal karyotype.

Pattima Pakhathirathien, Hathaipat Vaseenon, Weerin Thammachote, Chayanist Songpatanasilp, Praweena Sinpitak, Chintana Tocharoentanaphol, Natini Jinawath, Duangrurdee Wattanasirichaigoon

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical dysmorphology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pattima PakhathirathienDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok.
Hathaipat VaseenonDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok.
Weerin ThammachoteProgram in Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok.
Chayanist SongpatanasilpRamathibodi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University.
Praweena SinpitakDNA Center, Bangkok.
Chintana TocharoentanapholDNA Center, Bangkok.
Natini JinawathProgram in Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok.
Duangrurdee WattanasirichaigoonDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the cause of marked hypotonia and neonatal encephalopathy, mild anemia and thrombocytopenia, and nonspecific facial dysmorphism in a neonate after extensive neurological and biochemical evaluations, and karyotyping failed to establish the etiology.

methodsWhole exome sequencing (WES), single-nucleotide polymorphisms chromosomal microarray (SNPs CMA), and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) analysis were performed in the patient and the parents.

resultsWES did not show a candidate gene/diagnosis. Trio-CMA and FISH confirmed a de novo 8.9 Mb duplication of 11p15.4p15.5 and a 6.4 Mb deletion of 11q24.3q25 in the child, and that the duplicated 11p was of paternal origin, based on the SNPs analysis. On long-term follow-up, encephalopathy improved gradually, thrombocytopenia resolved, facial puffiness persisted, and developmental delay remained. The present patient represents the first case of de novo 11p duplication with 11q deletion and severe neonatal encephalopathy. The de novo chromosomal rearrangement could still have resulted from nonallelic homologous recombination, triggered by low-copy repeats (LCRs) at distal 11p and 11q during paternal meiosis, despite the lower LCR density. Alternatively, it may represent a random event, as it does not involve the recurrent deletion/duplication typically observed in regions with dense LCRs.

Indexed as

Chromosome DuplicationChromosome DeletionChromosomes, Human, Pair 11Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8Exome SequencingFathersHumansInfant, NewbornIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypeKaryotypingMalePhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide11p duplication11q deletionBeckwith–Wiedemann syndromeJacobsen syndromeneonatal encephalopathy

Identifiers

PMID41649143
PMCPMC12931855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.