Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41649093›Full record

ArticleNursing inquiry2026

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Indigenization in Saskatchewan's Undergraduate Nursing Programs.

Delasi Essien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Delasi EssienUniversity of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2084-7069

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nursing academy in Canada, motivated by the release of Canada's Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Calls to Action in 2015, has declared support for and commitment to Indigenization. This study, framed by the historical context of colonialism in Canadian healthcare and nursing education, aimed to understand the current state of Indigenization within undergraduate nursing programs in Saskatchewan. I explored three areas of inquiry: how strategic plans define Indigenization, staff experiences and practices in implementing it, and how these discourses and practices perpetuate or transform existing power structures. With Spivak's theory of the deconstruction of marginality as the overarching theoretical framework, I examined the strategic plans of three major post-secondary institutions and their respective undergraduate nursing programs using Fairclough's dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis. I also interviewed a total of seven nursing staff members from the three programs to gain an understanding of their practices of Indigenization. The study identified four key constructs of Indigenization within the discourse of the province of Saskatchewan's nursing education strategic plans: Indigenous inclusion, relationship, reconciliation, and decolonization. A critical finding is that presenting these four constructs as interchangeable diminishes their unique, albeit interconnected roles in achieving Indigenization goals. The research further shows how nursing programs are centering marginalized Indigenous Knowledges and systems but also reveals that racism remains a barrier to Indigenization. The study emphasizes the importance of explicitly defining Indigenization and its goals to deconstruct power dynamics and practices within nursing programs, and to continuously examine racism as a persistent issue in nursing education. The study encourages the nursing academy to adopt a decolonial lens in its everyday Indigenization efforts, which will bring about transformation of the academy.

Indexed as

Education, Nursing, BaccalaureateColonialismHumansSaskatchewancolonialismcritical discourse analysisIndigenizationnursing educationracismstrategic plans

Identifiers

PMID41649093
PMCPMC12879278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.