Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41649049›Full record

ReviewMicrobial biotechnology2026

Harnessing Microbial Volatile Organic Compounds for Crop Protection: Scientific Discovery, Bridging Ecological Function and On-Farm Application.

Katharina Belt, Lachlan Dow, Marta Gallart, Louise F Thatcher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploring the antifungal activity of the wheat microbiome.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rethinking microbial biopesticide development and uptake.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katharina BeltARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Lachlan DowCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Agriculture and Food, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Marta GallartCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Agriculture and Food, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Louise F ThatcherCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Agriculture and Food, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are integral to microbial ecological communication. Their potential as tools for sustainable crop protection is increasingly recognised, yet practical implementation remains limited. There are numerous in vitro lab-based studies focussed on screening single strains of soil or plant-associated microbes for their ability to produce VOCs and demonstrate their potential to inhibit plant pathogens or pests. Most of these, however, lack any validation in planta or in the field after petri dish experiments. This extends to a lack of understanding on whether the same VOCs are produced in vitro as in planta. How do we shift this focus and move from exciting lab-based discoveries to practical, scalable crop protection solutions for farmers? This opinion piece explores the current state of research on microbial VOCs for crop protection, translational challenges in deploying them on-farm, and highlights areas where learnings from the ecological roles of microbial VOCs can be leveraged towards field application.

Indexed as

BacteriaCrop ProtectionCrops, AgriculturalVolatile Organic CompoundsSoil MicrobiologyVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID41649049
PMCPMC12878796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.