Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41649033›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of social psychology2026

Don't rock the boat! Do men prefer women leaders who support the status quo?

Belle Derks, Francesca Manzi, Colette van Laar, Naomi Ellemers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of social psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Belle DerksSocial, Health and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0038-4134
Francesca ManziDepartment of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Colette van LaarKU Leuven, Center for Social and Cultural Psychology, Leuven, Belgium.
Naomi EllemersSocial, Health and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women remain underrepresented in leadership, particularly in traditionally masculine work settings. At the same time, the visibility of this imbalance has led to growing calls for diversifying leadership. This research examines how both men and women contribute to the preservation or disruption of gender inequality in masculine organizational contexts. Men remain the gatekeepers of change-deciding who rises to the top and under what conditions-while women face the strategic dilemma of fitting in by downplaying inequality (supporting the status quo, sometimes called 'queen bee behaviour') or 'rocking the boat' by advocating social change (challenging the status quo). Across five experimental studies (total N = 887), we examined how evaluators assessed male and female leadership candidates who either supported or challenged the status quo. Results revealed that although men favoured female over male candidates, they consistently preferred women who reinforced the status quo over those who advocated equality. By contrast, male candidates who supported the status quo were penalized, and female evaluators showed no such preferences. These findings highlight subtle mechanisms through which gendered power dynamics are maintained, underscoring both the strategic trade-offs women must navigate to advance and the conditional nature of men's support for gender equality.

Indexed as

Gender EquityLeadershipMasculinitySexismAdultFemaleHumansMalegender inequalitygender stereotypesmasculine defaultsqueen bee phenomenonsystem justificationwomen leaders

Identifiers

PMID41649033
PMCPMC12879291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.