Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41649028›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of language & communication disorders

An AI Tutorial for Speech and Language Therapists: Translating Concepts From the AI Literature Into Accessible Knowledge and Clinically Relevant Applications.

Ana Oliveira-Buckley, Barry O'Sullivan, Cristina McKean, Pauline Frizelle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana Oliveira-BuckleyDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8416-096X
Barry O'SullivanSchool of Computer Science and IT, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Cristina McKeanDepartment of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9058-9813
Pauline FrizelleDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9715-3788

Funding

Irish Research Council GOIPG/2024/4514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly discussed as a tool that can support speech and language therapy (SLT). However, clinical adoption of AI requires improved AI literacy among clinicians. AI is a rapidly evolving and often inconsistently defined field that can be difficult to navigate. Despite the definition provided by the EU AI Act, AI terminology can feel abstract for non-technical readers.

aimsTo provide a foundational understanding of AI tailored for SLTs, by translating complex concepts into accessible language and organising them across three levels: (i) AI techniques (how AI works); (ii) AI capabilities (what AI can do) and (iii) clinical applications (how AI can support SLT).

methodsThis tutorial is informed by foundational AI literature, established AI taxonomies, relevant SLT literature and regulatory and ethical guidelines. Clinical analogies are used to explain technical concepts, with additional technical detail signposted where relevant. Existing and conceptual examples illustrate the relevance of AI across paediatric SLT practice. MAIN CONTRIBUTION: This tutorial provides: (i) a clinician-focussed interpretation of the EU AI Act definition; (ii) an organisation of key AI concepts into techniques, capabilities and clinical applications; (iii) a production-line model for mapping clinical needs to AI design choices and (iv) a practice-focussed discussion of ethical and regulatory considerations.

conclusionAI is best understood as a set of techniques that enable specific capabilities, which in turn support clinical applications. This tutorial promotes the safe, ethical and accountable use of AI as a tool that can support rather than replace clinicians. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject Current Artificial Intelligence (AI) literature is typically designed for technical audiences, making it difficult for clinicians to interpret. This can hinder the effective and responsible integration of AI into clinical practice. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This tutorial provides a clinician-focussed explanation of AI, structured across three levels: (i) AI techniques (how AI works); (ii) AI capabilities (what AI can do) and (iii) clinical applications (how AI supports practice) in paediatric speech and language therapy. It also addresses key challenges, ethical considerations and regulatory requirements relevant to clinical contexts. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This tutorial lays the groundwork for informed engagement with emerging AI tools. It prepares clinicians to evaluate how different AI techniques and capabilities may support core clinical tasks (e.g., assessment, therapy planning and delivery).

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLanguage TherapySpeech TherapyHumansIntelligent SystemsTerminology as TopicTranslatingartificial intelligencechildlanguage therapyspeech therapy

Identifiers

PMID41649028
PMCPMC12879282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.