ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2026
A Program-Led Motivational App (MI-Coach: ED) for Eating Disorder Waitlists: Findings From a Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Trial.
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Program-Led Motivational App (MI-Coach: ED) for Eating Disorder Waitlists: Findings From a Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Trial.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIndividuals with eating disorders (EDs) often face significant barriers to accessing care, including prolonged waitlists and systemic delays. Digital interventions, such as mobile apps, offer a scalable way to enhance pre-treatment engagement during this high-risk period. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of MI-Coach: ED, a program-led mobile app designed to support motivation among female-identifying individuals awaiting ED treatment.
methodTwenty-three female-identifying individuals on waitlists at ED clinics across British Columbia, Canada, participated in a 4-week single-arm pilot trial of MI-Coach: ED. The app delivered motivational interviewing-informed content through seven sequential modules containing reflective exercises, psychoeducational articles, and psychologist-led videos. Feasibility was assessed via service-provider uptake, participant enrollment, engagement, and retention metrics. Acceptability was measured using the user version of the Mobile App Rating Scale and adapted Technology Acceptance Model ratings. Exploratory analyses descriptively examined pre-to-post changes in motivation and related symptoms.
resultsFeasibility was constrained at the service-provider level, with 6% of contacted sites agreeing to distribute study materials. At the participant level, 67.6% initiated app use and 44% completed at least four modules, and 78% completed pre- and post-assessments, indicating partial engagement across the sample. Participants rated the app positively across domains of quality, ease of use, and perceived usefulness. Small-to-medium reductions in global ED severity and depressive symptoms, as well as increases in motivational confidence, were observed with confidence intervals that did not cross zero. Change scores were moderately correlated across select motivational and symptom measures. DISCUSSION: Findings suggest that MI-Coach: ED was acceptable among users who engaged, while feasibility was substantially influenced by system-level recruitment constraints and variable participant engagement. Observed engagement patterns were lower than those reported for general mental health apps but consistent with prior digital ED intervention literature, underscoring the importance of disorder-specific feasibility benchmarks. Results will inform ongoing refinements and implementation strategies for a future randomized trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.