ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2025
Perceptions of medical students on language concordance in doctor-patient communications.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Qualitative Study of Factors Affecting Medication Adherence in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & objectives Language concordance-the ability of doctors to communicate with patients in their preferred language-is known to improve clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Medical undergraduates often face communication barriers with patients. This study aimed to assess the perceptions of undergraduate medical students regarding native language proficiency in clinical settings and its impact on doctor-patient relationships. Methods A descriptive, questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 409 MBBS students across various academic years in Karnataka, to assess students' views on language use in clinical interactions, its benefits, and barriers, using a 5-point Likert scale. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and the Kruskal-Wallis test for inter-year comparison. Open-ended responses underwent thematic analysis. Results Of the 409 participants, 26.2 per cent were non-native Kannada speakers. A majority agreed that language concordance enhances empathy, rapport, and effective communication with patients. Most students supported the inclusion of local language learning in the curriculum and recognised its role in improving clinical skills such as history-taking. Thematic analysis highlighted key concerns, including patient interaction challenges, clinical skill development, and student-led strategies to overcome language barriers. Interpretation & conclusions Medical students perceive language concordance as a vital component of effective clinical communication and patient care. There is strong support for structured, longitudinal local language training within the MBBS curriculum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.