ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2025
Birth preparedness & complication readiness of pregnant women in Meghalaya, India.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & objectives Maternal mortality remains a major global health issue, with India, particularly Meghalaya, contributing significantly to the burden. The three delays: decision-making, reaching a healthcare facility, and receiving care are key factors contributing to maternal deaths. Birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPCR) interventions aim to address these delays by preparing women for childbirth and its complications. This study evaluated the BPCR index and the quality of antenatal care (ANC) in Meghalaya, considering the perspectives of both pregnant women and healthcare providers. Methods A mixed-methods design was employed in different blocks of East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. A quantitative design was used to assess the BPCR index among 200 pregnant women. Direct observations of a subset of over 10 per cent of the ANC checkups were done to assess their quality. Additionally, in-depth interviews with 14 pregnant women and eight healthcare providers explored factors influencing BPCR and the quality of ANC. Results The BPCR index from this study was 43.4 per cent. Only 5 per cent of pregnant women could identify at least one danger sign of pregnancy. Direct observations revealed that the quality of ANC concerning BPCR was poor, with none of the ANC check-ups incorporating BPCR counselling. In-depth interviews also revealed that none of the healthcare providers were aware of BPCR counselling. Interpretation & conclusion The study revealed a critical lack of awareness about danger signs, contributing to the low birth preparedness and complication readiness. The absence of related counselling during ANC visits highlights a significant gap in maternal care and preparedness in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.