Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41648963›Full record

SynthesisThe Indian journal of medical research2025

Workplace exposure to aflatoxins & its health effects: A systematic review.

Geethu Mathew, Lavannya Mary Thayil, Preetham Shenoy M, Meera Sasidharan, Pawan Kumar B, Priya Selvam, Shubhangi Pingle, Raghavan Sampathraj, Nanjesh Kumar S, Ravichandran Beerappa and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Studies on seed-borne fungi,Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Geethu MathewDepartment of Occupational Medicine, ICMR - Regional Occupational Health Centre (Southern), National Institute of Occupational Health, Bengaluru, India.
Lavannya Mary ThayilDepartment of Community Medicine, KS Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Preetham Shenoy MDepartment of Community Medicine, KS Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Meera SasidharanDepartment of Community Medicine, KS Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Pawan Kumar BDepartment of Community Medicine, KS Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Priya SelvamDepartment of Occupational Medicine, ICMR - Regional Occupational Health Centre (Southern), National Institute of Occupational Health, Bengaluru, India.
Shubhangi PingleDepartment of Biochemistry, ICMR - Regional Occupational Health Centre (Southern), National Institute of Occupational Health, Bengaluru, India.
Raghavan SampathrajDepartment of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, ICMR - Regional Occupational Health Centre (Southern), National Institute of Occupational Health, Bengaluru, India.
Nanjesh Kumar SDepartment of Community Medicine, KS Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Ravichandran BeerappaDepartment of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, ICMR - Regional Occupational Health Centre (Southern), National Institute of Occupational Health, Bengaluru, India.
Bhavani Shankara BagepallyDepartment of Health Systems Research, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology (NIE), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives Aflatoxins pose serious health risks to humans and livestock, with ingestion being the most common route of exposure. In occupational settings, workers can also be exposed through inhalation of organic dust and dermal contact. The review aimed to provide an overview of aflatoxin exposure and health effects among workers. Methods Observational studies investigating occupational exposure to aflatoxins and their health effects were systematically screened in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus till June 2024. Studies meeting inclusion criteria, were assessed for their methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results Overall, 12,610 studies were screened of which 17 studies were included in the final review. Food-grain workers, farmers, millers, bakers, grain handlers, oil pressors, and feed mixers, are at a higher risk of occupational exposure to aflatoxins. Assessment of exposure was done by analysing biological fluids (Blood, Urine, and Bronchoalveolar lavage) and samples from the working environment (settled dust, airborne dust, and personal sampling) using enzyme-Linked Immunoassay and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Studies have shown an elevation of hepatic and renal enzymes, an increased risk for hepatobiliary cancer, and an increased risk for tumour markers, oxidative markers, and reduced antioxidant levels. One recent study has also found an association between aflatoxin exposure and weight for age and height among children of workers. Interpretation & conclusions Occupational exposure to aflatoxins is associated with hepatic and renal toxicity and increased carcinogenic risk. These findings highlight the need of large scale dose- response studies, workplace monitoring and regular health surveillance among workers.

Indexed as

AflatoxinsOccupational ExposureAnimalsHumansWorking ConditionsWorkplaceAflatoxinsAflatoxinsbiological assessmentcancerenvironmental assessmentfood-grain workershealth effects

Identifiers

PMID41648963
PMCPMC12883113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.