Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41648954›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Age at Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Short-Term Postoperative Outcomes for Women Treated in a Universal Health System.

Gabrielle Falco, Sarah Darmon, Matthew Nealeigh, Robert W Krell, Craig D Shriver, Kangmin Zhu, Yvonne L Eaglehouse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gabrielle FalcoDepartment of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Sarah DarmonMurtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Matthew NealeighMurtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Robert W KrellMurtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Craig D ShriverMurtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kangmin ZhuMurtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Yvonne L EaglehouseMurtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9077-4688

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionSurgery is an essential component of breast cancer treatment. Surgical complications may impact receipt of adjuvant therapy and long-term outcomes. Differences in insurance coverage and access to care by patient age in the general U.S. population may affect breast cancer diagnosis and surgery and thus age comparisons in research. We compared postoperative outcomes following breast cancer surgery between age groups in the U.S. Military Health System, which provides beneficiaries access to comprehensive care across the lifespan.MethodsWe identified women aged ≥18 years with stage I-III breast cancer diagnosed from 2001 to 2014 undergoing surgery without reconstruction in the MilCanEpi database. Multivariable Poisson regression estimated the adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in association with age at diagnosis (18-39, 40-49, 50-64, and ≥65) for 30-day general and breast complications (surgical site infection, seroma, hematoma, or lymphedema), reoperation, and hospital readmission while controlling for potential confounders.ResultsThe study included 7835 women who were 18-39 (9.2%), 40-49 (23.6%), 50-64 (42.7%), and ≥65 (24.5%). The overall risk of general or breast complications did not differ significantly by age when controlled for demographic, tumor, and treatment variables. However, women aged 40-49 had a statistically increased adjusted risk of seroma (ARR = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.03-2.18) compared to women aged 50-64. No significant age-related differences were observed for reoperation or hospital readmission after adjustment.ConclusionIn the Military Health System, the overall risk of 30-day postoperative complications and hospital readmissions were not statistically different by age after adjustment for clinical and demographic factors. The findings support that surgical decision-making continue to prioritize tumor characteristics, comorbidity burden, and other clinical factors rather than age alone when assessing perioperative risk.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMastectomyPostoperative ComplicationsUniversal Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung Adultagebreast cancerbreast-conserving surgerycomplicationsmastectomy

Identifiers

PMID41648954
PMCPMC12881331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.