ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2024
Safety and efficacy of a novel ultrathin gastroscope for unsedated transnasal endoscopy in children and adults for evaluation of upper GI disorders.
Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Narrative Review on Diagnosis and Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The mouth or the nose: the past, present, and future of ultra-slim gastroscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract in pediatrics.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- High Prevalence of Patient Intolerance to Unsedated Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Portuguese Population.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Sedation-free transnasal endoscopy (TNE) is a valuable tool for endoscopic evaluation of the upper GI tract without the risk of general anesthesia. In pediatrics, bronchoscopes are often used for TNE, which precludes gastroduodenal evaluation. We evaluated the use of a novel ultrathin (3.5-mm) gastroscope. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study involved 7 U.S. hospitals from May 2022 to July 2023. Data were collected from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was the safety and efficacy measured by completion rate and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were procedure and encounter duration and biopsy sample adequacy. Results: Fifty-three patients were recruited. Indications were eosinophilic esophagitis surveillance (n = 51) and esophageal variceal evaluation (n = 2). Mean patient age was 15.1 years (range, 6-37 years) with a male predominance (84.9%). Four procedures were unable to be completed. The procedure was successful in 92.4%, and the device success rate was 94.3%. Extent of intended accessibility was transnasal esophagoscopy in 3 patients, transnasal esophagogastroscopy in 42 patients, and transnasal EGD in 4 patients. Almost 40% underwent TNE for the first time. Biopsy samples obtained were adequate for histopathologic analyses. No significant adverse events were observed. Five patients (9.4%) experienced minimal epistaxis, gagging, and nasal pain. Conclusions: Sedation-free TNE using a single-use gastroscope was well tolerated and safe in pediatric and adult age groups with a success rate similar to previous studies. User feedback noted that the single-use gastroscopes provided improved visualization, increased length, and larger working channel to allow for diagnostic EGD in an efficient ambulatory setting without general anesthesia.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.