ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2024
Non-reassuring findings in adjacent independent pancreatic cysts.
Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The higher number of imaging examinations (CT and magnetic resonance imaging) being performed and their improved definition are increasing the number of incidental diagnoses of pancreatic cystic lesions. It is therefore necessary to differentiate benign cysts from those with a potential for malignancy that may require surveillance or further treatment. To do so, lesions that present risk stigmata (worrisome features) must be stratified, integrating the findings with the patient age, comorbidities, and performance status. We describe a case of difficult interpretation of the risk stigmata because there were 2 adjacent independent cysts of distinct nature. We emphasize the role of EUS with FNA as crucial for decision-making at the multidisciplinary meeting.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.