ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2024
Safety and efficacy of diphenhydramine as an adjunct to midazolam and fentanyl use for sedation in young patients undergoing endoscopic evaluation: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Achieving adequate sedation may be difficult for young patients and can be associated with adverse events. Diphenhydramine (DPH) has not been studied in patients <45 years of age undergoing endoscopy. The aim of this study, therefore, was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DPH as an adjunct to fentanyl/midazolam during endoscopy in this patient population. Methods: A retrospective, single-center cohort study was performed in patients aged 18 to 44 years who underwent EGD, colonoscopy, or both between 2020 and 2021. Patients who received DPH as an adjunct to fentanyl/midazolam (DPH group) were compared with those who received fentanyl/midazolam alone (non-DPH group). Outcomes included the incidence of adverse events, total facility time, total recovery time, total time to adequate sedation, and total sedation dose of midazolam and fentanyl used in both groups. Results: A total of 714 patients met the inclusion criteria: DPH group (n = 375) versus non-DPH group (n = 339). There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events ( Conclusions: This study found that DPH as an adjunctive sedative is safe and well tolerated in patients aged <45 years undergoing endoscopy and does not prolong the procedure or recovery time. Further prospective studies are needed to assess if DPH improves patient comfort, tolerance, and overall experience during endoscopic procedures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.