ReviewIntestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)
Quality of life in pediatric intestinal failure: A scoping review.
Review in Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-Term Outcomes and Clinical Course of Pediatric Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Interest in quality of life (QoL) of children with intestinal failure (IF) has increased in recent years, driven by improved survival rates. Conceptualization and measurement of QoL remains understudied. As such, we conducted a scoping review to systemically catalogue measures of QoL, collate existing findings about QoL among IF patients, and examine risk and protective factors. Methods: A systemic search was conducted across four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL) from inception to May 6, 2024. Included articles had to explicitly operationalize and measure QoL among pediatric IF patients (< 18 years of age). Results: Thirty-three articles met inclusion criteria from an initial screen of 2124. Across studies, QoL was most frequently measured through standardized questionnaires, with the PedsQL most frequently employed. On self-report, patients reported worse health-related QoL, as well as lower physical, social, and school functioning, compared to controls. Adolescents with IF reported worse QoL than children. Youth and caregivers diverged in their reporting on QoL, with caregivers reporting worse overall QoL outcomes than children. Medical (bowel functioning), social (participation in activities with peers), and familial (parental stress and anxiety) risk and protective factors also emerged. Conclusions: IF has been found to have a negative impact on QoL for children and caregivers. It will be important to establish a standardized IF-specific QoL questionnaire to capture IF-relevant medical and treatment parameters, as well as include an evaluation of physical, emotional, social, psychological, and school functioning. Our findings help lay groundwork for establishing clinical guidelines for patient assessment and monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.