Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41648861›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2025

Deep learning software and revised 2D model to segment bone in micro-CT scans.

Andrew H Lee, Ganesh Talluri, Manan Damani, Brandon Vera Covarrubias, Helena Hanna, Jeremy Chavez, Julian M Moore, Jacob Baradarian, Michael Molgaard, Beau Nielson and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Andrew H LeeDepartment of Anatomy, College of Graduate Studies, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, United States.
Ganesh TalluriBASIS Peoria, Peoria, AZ, United States.
Manan DamaniCore Facilities-Glendale, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, United States.
Brandon Vera CovarrubiasDepartment of Anatomy, College of Graduate Studies, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, United States.
Helena HannaArizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, United States.
Jeremy ChavezArizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, United States.
Julian M MooreArizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, United States.
Jacob Baradarian *Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, United States.
Michael Molgaard *Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, United States.
Beau Nielson *Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, United States.
Kalah Walden *Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, United States.
Thomas L Broderick *Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, United States.
Layla Al-Nakkash *Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) enables automated bone segmentation in micro-CT datasets but can struggle to generalize across developmental stages, anatomical regions, and imaging conditions. We present BP-2D-03, which is a revised 2D Bone-Pores segmentation model. It was fitted to a dataset comprising 20 micro-CT scans spanning five mammalian species and 142,960 image patches. To manage the substantially larger and more varied dataset, we developed a DL software interface with modules for training ("BONe DLFit"), prediction ("BONe DLPred"), and evaluation ("BONe IoU"). These tools resolve prior issues such as slice-level data leakage, high memory usage, and limited multi-GPU support. Model performance was evaluated through three analyses. First, 5-fold cross-validation with three seeds per fold evaluated baseline robustness and stability. The model showed generally high mean Intersection-over-Union (IoU) with minimal variation across seeds, but performance varied more across folds related to differences in scan composition. These findings show that the baseline model is stable overall but that predictivity can decline for atypical scans. Second, 30 benchmarking experiments tested how model architecture, encoder backbone, and patch size influence segmentation IoU and computational efficiency. U-Net and UNet++ architectures with simple convolutional backbones (e.g., ResNet-18) achieved the highest IoU values, approaching 0.97. Third, cross-platform experiments confirmed that results are consistent across hardware configurations, operating systems, and implementations (Avizo 3D and standalone). Together, these analyses demonstrate that the BONe DL software delivers robust baseline performance and reproducible results across platforms.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceavizobonebone marrowmammalsemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID41648861
PMCPMC12868216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.