ArticleIntestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)
Neurodevelopmental, cognitive and motor function: Practice recommendations in pediatric intestinal failure and transplantation- position statement of the International Intestinal Rehabilitation and Transplant Association allied health committee.
Article in Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motor and cognitive outcomes in pediatric intestinal failure: A longitudinal cohort study.Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)Article
- Caregiver perspectives on barriers and facilitators to pediatric intestinal failure quality of life.Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)Article
- Physical function, physical activity, muscle strength, and body composition: Clinical practice recommendations in pediatric intestinal failure and transplantation-position statement of the International Intestinal Rehabilitation and Transplant Association Allied Health Committee.Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The objective of this position statement was to provide evidence-based and expert-informed recommendations for the assessment and treatment of neurodevelopment in children with intestinal failure and those undergoing intestinal transplant. Material and methods: A literature review was conducted to identify and review research articles from 2000 to 2023 that reported on neurodevelopmental, neurocognitive and motor outcomes in children (0-18 years) with intestinal failure or intestinal transplant. Key recommendations to address these outcomes were made based on scientific evidence and expert-informed opinion. Results: The impact of intestinal failure and transplant on developmental outcomes was established, along with key risk factors related to the disease that may result in poorer outcomes. The involvement of rehabilitation specialists was recommended as part of the multidisciplinary intestinal care team to provide assessment and treatment across all developmental domains from infancy onwards. Care teams should provide close follow-up which may include screening during out-patient clinic follow up, along with timely community referrals to address developmental delays. Children undergoing intestinal or multi-visceral transplant require assessment and treatment both pre and post-transplant to maximize developmental outcomes. Conclusions: This position paper reviews available literature related to developmental outcomes in intestinal failure and transplant, delineating risk factors which may contribute to poorer outcomes. It lays the foundation for tangible steps to assist intestinal care teams in advocating for the services of rehabilitation team members to provide ongoing assessment and treatment to optimize clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.