Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41648850›Full record

SynthesisDepression and anxiety2026

Mnemonic Discrimination Performance in Anxiety and Depression: A Systematic Review.

Alexandra Kaszás, Szabolcs Kéri

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Depression and anxiety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandra KaszásDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rakpart 3, Budapest, 1111, Hungary, bme.hu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4075-9777
Szabolcs KériUniversity of Tokaj, Eötvös út 7, Sárospatak, 3950, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7638-1741

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety disorders and depression are the most frequently diagnosed mental illnesses and are highly comorbid. Both have been linked to memory impairments, albeit the relationship between them remains unclear and understudied. Our review aims to investigate behavioral pattern separation performance in individuals with varying levels of anxiety and depression. We included studies where mnemonic discrimination performance is measured using mnemonic discrimination tasks designed to directly measure behavioral pattern separation, while symptoms of anxiety and/or depression are assessed using any validated and recognized scales or inventories. We only included quantitative studies. Fixed scientific databases and artificial intelligence were systematically searched, identifying nine studies on anxiety and 14 on depression. Anxiety studies presented conflicting evidence, but a trend showed optimal mnemonic discrimination with threat-based encoding and safe retrieval. Conversely, depression studies consistently suggested a negative relationship between symptom severity and pattern separation performance. Additionally, pattern separation appeared enhanced for negative stimuli and impaired for neutral stimuli in individuals with higher levels of depression. However, no clear differences were observed between clinically diagnosed groups and healthy controls. Methodological inconsistencies in anxiety studies present challenges for interpretation. Similarly, the effects of medication and the heterogeneity of clinical groups pose limitations to depression studies. Trends were identified, but further investigation with unified methodologies and clinical groups is needed to understand the relationship between anxiety, depression, and mnemonic discrimination performance.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersDepressive DisorderDiscrimination, PsychologicalHumansanxietydepressionmnemonic discriminationpattern separationsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41648850
PMCPMC12869273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.