SynthesisDepression and anxiety2026
Mnemonic Discrimination Performance in Anxiety and Depression: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Depression and anxiety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mnemonic Discrimination Performance in Anxiety and Depression: A Systematic Review.Depression and anxiety · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anxiety disorders and depression are the most frequently diagnosed mental illnesses and are highly comorbid. Both have been linked to memory impairments, albeit the relationship between them remains unclear and understudied. Our review aims to investigate behavioral pattern separation performance in individuals with varying levels of anxiety and depression. We included studies where mnemonic discrimination performance is measured using mnemonic discrimination tasks designed to directly measure behavioral pattern separation, while symptoms of anxiety and/or depression are assessed using any validated and recognized scales or inventories. We only included quantitative studies. Fixed scientific databases and artificial intelligence were systematically searched, identifying nine studies on anxiety and 14 on depression. Anxiety studies presented conflicting evidence, but a trend showed optimal mnemonic discrimination with threat-based encoding and safe retrieval. Conversely, depression studies consistently suggested a negative relationship between symptom severity and pattern separation performance. Additionally, pattern separation appeared enhanced for negative stimuli and impaired for neutral stimuli in individuals with higher levels of depression. However, no clear differences were observed between clinically diagnosed groups and healthy controls. Methodological inconsistencies in anxiety studies present challenges for interpretation. Similarly, the effects of medication and the heterogeneity of clinical groups pose limitations to depression studies. Trends were identified, but further investigation with unified methodologies and clinical groups is needed to understand the relationship between anxiety, depression, and mnemonic discrimination performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.