Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41648848›Full record

ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2022

Novel through-the-scope steerable grasper for dynamic traction reduces dissection time and technical demand in endoscopic submucosal dissection in novice endoscopists compared with clip-and-line traction method: an ex vivo randomized study.

Abhishek Agnihotri, Divya Chalikonda, Daniel Scanlon, Brianna Shinn, Ritu Nahar, Christopher Cao, Scott Manski, Alice S Pang, Christopher J Schmoyer, Alexander G Pop and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Abhishek AgnihotriDivision of Gastroenterology, Bayhealth Medical Center, Dover, Delaware, USA.
Divya ChalikondaDivision of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Daniel ScanlonDivision of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Brianna ShinnDivision of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ritu NaharDivision of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Christopher CaoDivision of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Scott ManskiDivision of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alice S PangDivision of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Christopher J SchmoyerDivision of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alexander G PopDivision of Gastroenterology, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
William P HaberstrohDivision of Gastroenterology, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Inki HongDivision of Gastroenterology, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
David E LorenDivision of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Thomas KowalskiDivision of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Anand R KumarDivision of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Austin L ChiangDivision of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alexander SchlachtermanDivision of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Lack of effective tissue traction devices to facilitate endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) leads to prolonged dissection time. We aimed to study the efficacy of a novel through-the-scope steerable grasper arm (SGA) for dynamic traction compared with the clip-and-line (CL) traction method in an ex vivo setting. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, randomized ex vivo study. In a porcine stomach model, two 25-mm circular lesions were marked. Novice endoscopists with no prior ESD experience performed ESD with both traction methods (SGA and CL). Each participant was randomized to either SGA first (study group) or CL first (control group). The primary outcome was total dissection time in minutes. Adverse events of muscle injury, perforation, mucosal injury, or fragmentation were noted. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) task load index (TLX) was used to grade technical workload. Results: Ten subjects participated in the study, and 5 were randomized to the SGA method first. The mean dissection time was significantly shorter with SGA compared with CL (5.07 ± 2.19 minutes vs 20.07 ± 8.45 minutes, Conclusions: With novice endoscopists performing ESD, SGA traction leads to faster dissection time compared with the CL method with a reduced technical workload in an ex vivo setting. The SGA is a promising tool to improve efficiency and the learning curve of ESD.

Identifiers

PMID41648848
PMCPMC12850902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.