ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2025
Efficacy and safety of a multi-degree-of-freedom articulating forceps for endoscopic submucosal dissection and closure of large mucosal defects in a porcine model.
Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) articulating forceps for flexible endoscopy feature a unique device combining rotating and bending articulation to provide active traction. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the MDOF articulating forceps for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and closure of large post-ESD mucosal defects using a linearized closure technique. Methods: Four rectal sites (20-50 mm) and 3 gastric sites (20-40 mm) were resected in explanted porcine models. ESD was performed by applying active traction of the articulating forceps to the mucosal flap. After ESD, the articulating forceps were used for defect closure by grasping an edge of the mucosal defect and pulling it toward the luminal cavity, allowing submucosal tissue apposition within the defect and configuration of the linear defect for easy through-the-scope clip closure. Results: The mean procedure times of the gastric and rectal ESD were 16.1 ± 8.7 minutes and 20.7 ± 4.3 minutes, respectively. The mean sizes of the post-ESD gastric and rectal mucosal defects were 38.0 ± 12.6 mm and 43.8 ± 10.2 mm. No injury to the muscularis propria or perforations occurred. Complete clip closure was achieved in all mucosal defects. The mean procedure time for defect closure was 29.3 ± 5.4 minutes in the stomach and 15.5 ± 5.2 minutes in the rectum. The mean combined procedure times for ESD and clip closure were 45.4 ± 13.5 minutes in the stomach and 36.3 ± 7.9 minutes in the rectum. Conclusions: The MDOF articulating forceps seem to be an effective and safe adjunct traction tool for ESD and closure of large mucosal defects. Future clinical studies are needed to validate the efficiency, safety, and durability of this approach.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.