Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41648812›Full record

ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2025

Impact of novel lightweight disposable gastroscope and duodenoscope on endoscopist muscle activation: a comparative study.

Veronica Bessone, Robin Rusnak, Sven Adamsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Veronica BessoneHuman Factors Engineering, Research & Development, Ambu Innovation, Augsburg, Germany.
Robin RusnakHuman Factors Engineering, Research & Development, Ambu Innovation, Augsburg, Germany.
Sven AdamsenClinical Applications, Research & Development, Ambu, Ballerup, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Musculoskeletal injuries are common among endoscopists, and reducing the endoscope weight is considered to be a preventive measure. We aimed to assess the impact on muscle activation of recently developed lightweight gastroscopes and duodenoscopes, compared with standard endoscopes in a 2-part study. Methods: In the first part, 14 participants performed a protocol using a lightweight disposable and a standard reusable gastroscope in a random order. The protocol constituted of 3 equal working blocks with repetitive and standardized movements. In the second part, 15 endoscopists used a lightweight disposable and a reusable duodenoscope in an artificial model and at rest. For both protocols, the subjects wore a sleeve with embedded superficial electromyographic sensors on the left arm. Results: Wrist flexor muscle activation was significantly lower when using the lightweight single-use endoscopes during the protocol tasks ( Conclusions: Standardized operation with lightweight endoscopes reduces the load on the left forearm muscles and favors muscle rest compared with heavier standard endoscopes. These improvements in user ergonomics may aid in preventing or delaying the development of tremor, fatigue, and injuries.

Identifiers

PMID41648812
PMCPMC12850842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.