Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41648749›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Optimizing clinical nutrition practices: impact of a formulary prescription-based nutrition therapy protocol in surgical patients.

Mengying Xu, Jiaojiao Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mengying XuDepartment of Pharmacy, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou Dushu Lake Hospital, Medical Center of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jiaojiao MaoDepartment of Pharmacy, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou Dushu Lake Hospital, Medical Center of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Parenteral nutrition (PN) is a crucial clinical therapy, particularly in surgical patients. However, due to the complex composition of PN formulations, the inappropriate use of PN remains widespread in clinical practice to date. This study established a formulary prescription-based nutrition therapy protocol and assessed the effectiveness of its implementation. Method: The formulary prescription-based nutrition therapy program included the development of formulary prescriptions for PN and the establishment of a perioperative nutrition medication pathway based on the formulary prescriptions. To evaluate the effect of this protocol in clinical practice, a before-and-after cohort analysis was performed to compare PN administration modalities hospital-wide and nutrition therapy strategies in targeted surgical (general surgery and thoracic surgery) departments. Patients admitted in hospital with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers and receiving abdominal surgery during the study period were further retrospectively analyzed. Nutrition status of patients was evaluated using the levels of postoperative serum albumin and prealbumin. Recovery time and surgical or nutrition-related complications and were also collated as the clinical outcomes. Results: The proportion of all-in-one (AIO) admixture orders increased from 47.2 to 85.2%, while multi-bottle systems (MBSs) decreased from 52.8 to 14.8% ( Conclusion: The formulary prescription-based nutrition therapy protocol can significantly enhance the rational use of PN drugs hospital-wide, optimize clinical nutrition strategies in the surgical patients, and improve short-term clinical outcomes in the patients undergoing GI cancer surgery.

Indexed as

formulary prescriptiongastrointestinal cancernutrition therapyparenteral nutritionsurgical patients

Identifiers

PMID41648749
PMCPMC12867831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.