Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41648743›Full record

ArticleESMO gastrointestinal oncology2024

Immune checkpoint expression and co-expression landscape in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Y Vedire, S Kalvapudi, R J Seager, R Duve, J Conroy, S Pabla, S Mukherjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Y VedireDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, USA.
S KalvapudiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, USA.
R J SeagerOmniSeq, Inc., Buffalo, USA.
R DuveDepartment of Internal Medicine, University at Buffalo School of Medicine, Buffalo, USA.
J ConroyOmniSeq, Inc., Buffalo, USA.
S PablaOmniSeq, Inc., Buffalo, USA.
S MukherjeeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Addition of immunotherapy to standard chemotherapy marginally improved outcomes in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEAC). Recently, dual immunotherapy has shown efficacy in melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer over single checkpoint inhibition. We sought to decipher the expression landscape of commonly targeted immune checkpoints in GEAC with a particular attention to their co-expression with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Materials and methods: Targeted RNA sequencing was carried out on 65 metastatic GEAC tumors obtained from, and gene expression was measured for 394 immune transcripts. Co-expression analyses were conducted by calculating Pearson correlations for every possible pair of 15 checkpoint genes and clustering groups of similarly expressed genes. These analyses were validated using a 90-patient cohort identified from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Results: The clinical cohort was primarily male (86.2%), Caucasian (93.9%), and had positive PD-L1 status (63.1%). The correlation matrix delineated two clusters of co-expression with the first including PD-L1, programmed cell death protein 1 ( Conclusions: We show that immune checkpoints are often co-expressed in GEAC, suggesting possible common underlying mechanisms for checkpoint expression. Strong correlation between checkpoints like

Indexed as

co-expressiongastroesophageal adenocarcinomagene expressionICIimmune checkpointsimmunotherapyPD-L1RNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID41648743
PMCPMC12836530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.