ArticleESMO gastrointestinal oncology2024
Higher rate of pathologic complete response in patients with early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer.
Article in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early-onset gastrointestinal cancer patterns in Navarre: incidence, tumour features and patient survival outcomes.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Total neoadjuvant therapy in early-onset rectal cancer: A multicentre prospective cohort study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025Article
- The TEOGIC study project: a comprehensive characterization of early onset gastrointestinal cancer in the Northern area of Spain.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Retrospective Evaluation of the Efficacy of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy and Chemoradiotherapy Neoadjuvant Treatment in Relation to Surgery in Patients with Rectal Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer have progressively decreased during the past decades, early-onset rectal cancer (EORC; <50 years old) is rising alarmingly. EORC is often diagnosed at advanced stages and presents intrinsic molecular alterations. New strategies are necessary to increase early diagnosis and to improve therapeutic management. We present the analysis of our locally advanced EORC patients evaluating their specific response to chemoradiotherapy. Materials and methods: Patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and treated with curative surgery after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) with chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively analysed, comparing differences between EORC and late-onset rectal cancer (LORC). Incidence rates between 2001 and 2020, as well as diagnostic and treatment response variables, were compared. Results: Up to 1140 patients were diagnosed with rectal cancer and underwent curative surgery. From them, there were 399 patients with LARC who received NAT before surgery, and 9% of them had EORC (36 patients). The incidence of locally advanced EORC increased from 6.6% to 12.7% (2001-2020). No differences were found considering diagnostic variables between the early- and late-onset cohorts, although slightly more deficient mismatch repair tumours were found within the EORC cohort. Mean disease-free survival and mean cancer-specific survival were similar. Notwithstanding, EORC patients achieve higher rates of pathological complete responses (pCRs), compared with LARC (36.3% versus12.4%; Conclusions: Our analyses confirm the increase in incidence of EORC from 2001 to 2020 in Navarra. EORC patients achieved a higher pCR rate, thus suggesting that the role of organ preservation strategies should be further investigated in this unique population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.