ArticleESMO gastrointestinal oncology2024
Real-world outcomes of trifluridine/tipiracil for heavily pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Article in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Trifluridine (FTD)/tipiracil (TPI) is a standard salvage treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI in heavily pretreated patients with AGC in clinical practice. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study conducted at a single Japanese institute between November 2019 and May 2022 included patients with inoperable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (GC) who received FTD/TPI with or without ramucirumab (RAM) in the third-line or later setting. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to examine the clinical factors associated with disease progression and survival. Results: A total of 98 consecutive patients, including 2 patients treated with RAM, were enrolled. Eighty-five patients had prior immune checkpoint inhibitor administration before FTD/TPI and 86 patients were treated with FTD/FPI as the fourth or later line of treatment. Objective response rate was 2.3% (2/87), and disease control rate was 40.2% (35/87). Nausea, anorexia, and diarrhea were the observed adverse events (AEs) in 45, 24, and 19 patients, respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 AE was neutropenia. Multivariate analysis revealed that performance status (PS) ≥1, elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and/or carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels, and primary tumor location were independently associated with shorter progression-free survival. In terms of overall survival, PS ≥1, elevated serum CEA and/or CA19-9, and the presence of moderate to severe ascites demonstrated statistically significant associations with poorer survival. Conclusions: FTD/TPI could be a therapeutic option for AGC patients previously treated with nivolumab in clinical practice. AEs associated with FTD/TPI were manageable in heavily pretreated patients with AGC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.