Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41648666›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

The Berlin-Hannover ICANS severity assessment-a novel bedside test to evaluate CAR T-cell-associated neurotoxicity.

Lotta Völker, Leonie Müller-Jensen, Sophia Carl, Sandra Nay, Thiemo Malte Möllenkamp, Christian Schultze-Florey, Lea Grote-Levi, Konstantin F Jendretzky, Franz Felix Konen, Christian Könecke and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Lotta VölkerDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Leonie Müller-JensenCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Klinik für Neurologie mit Experimenteller Neurologie, Berlin, Germany.
Sophia CarlDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Sandra NayDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Thiemo Malte MöllenkampDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Christian Schultze-FloreyDepartment of Haematology, Haemostaseology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Lea Grote-LeviDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Konstantin F JendretzkyDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Franz Felix KonenDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Christian KöneckeDepartment of Haematology, Haemostaseology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Matthias EderDepartment of Haematology, Haemostaseology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Victoria PanagiotaDepartment of Haematology, Haemostaseology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Florian H HeidelDepartment of Haematology, Haemostaseology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Lars BullingerDepartment of Haematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Frederik DammDepartment of Haematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Mareike FrickDepartment of Haematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Olaf PenackDepartment of Haematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Rebecca LudwigBerlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Eric Anil BußCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Klinik für Neurologie mit Experimenteller Neurologie, Berlin, Germany.
Wolfgang BoehmerleCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Klinik für Neurologie mit Experimenteller Neurologie, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias EndresCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Klinik für Neurologie mit Experimenteller Neurologie, Berlin, Germany.
Viktoria GudiDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Petra HuehnchenCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Klinik für Neurologie mit Experimenteller Neurologie, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas Skripuletz *Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Nora Möhn *Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment of refractory hematological malignancies but is frequently complicated by immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Early clinical recognition remains challenging, as the commonly used Immune Effector Cell-Associated Encephalopathy (ICE) score lacks sensitivity for subtle deficits. Methods: In this prospective bicentric study, 100 patients treated with CAR T-cells at Hannover Medical School and Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin underwent systematic neurological assessments using both ICE and the newly developed Berlin-Hannover ICANS Severity Assessment (BHISA). Examinations were performed at baseline prior to CAR T-cell infusion, on day 6-7 (±1 day) post-infusion, and during ICANS episodes. Data on the clinical course, other toxicities, comorbidities, CAR T-cell products, and ICANS treatment were collected. Results: Thirty-seven patients (37%) developed ICANS, which was associated with preceding cytokine release syndrome and specific CAR T-cell products. While ICE scores clustered at maximum values both at baseline and follow-up, BHISA showed a broader distribution and higher sensitivity to subtle changes. Correlation analyses confirmed agreement between ICE and BHISA, but BHISA captured early cognitive decline more reliably. Receiver operating characteristic analyses demonstrated comparable diagnostic accuracy (BHISA: AUC = 0.783, ICE: AUC = 0,777), with consistently higher sensitivity of BHISA at matched specificity. (Specificity target = 0.7, BHISA sensitivity = 0.743, ICE sensitivity = 0.571; Specificity target = 0.8, BHISA sensitivity = 0.629, ICE sensitivity = 0.571). Conclusion: BHISA may provide a more sensitive and more differentiated screening tool for ICANS than ICE by incorporating additional cognitive and motor domains, while remaining easy to use. This may enable earlier and more nuanced detection of CAR T related neurotoxicity, potentially improving patient monitoring across a heterogeneous population.

Indexed as

BHISACAR T-cell therapyICANSICEscreening tools

Identifiers

PMID41648666
PMCPMC12867840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.