ArticleFrontiers in neurology
An interpretable machine learning model for predicting sepsis risk in ICU patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage: development and validation using the MIMIC-IV database.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of machine learning models to predict 30-day mortality in patients with cardiac arrest complicated by acute kidney injury.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of a prediction model for major adverse kidney events within 30 days in sepsis associated acute kidney injury: a multi-center retrospective clinical study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) prediction model for assessing the risk of sepsis in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), thereby providing a reference for the early clinical identification of high risk patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database, which includes admissions between 2008 and 2022. We extracted demographic information, laboratory parameters, complications, and other clinical data. Patients were randomly divided into a training set and a test set in an 8:2 ratio. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression was used to identify core predictive features. Fourteen machine learning models were constructed, including Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Kernel-based SVM, Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, Partial Least Squares, Boosting Method, Neural Network, Naive Bayes, Discriminant Analysis, Lasso, XGBoost, CATBoost, and LightGBM. Key evaluation metrics included sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1 score, Youden index, and the area under the curve (AUC). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was employed to interpret the model's decision logic, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) was used to assess clinical utility. Results: A total of 1,052 patients with non-traumatic SAH were enrolled, with 841 assigned to the training set and 211 to the test set. Lasso regression identified 11 core predictive features, including pneumonia, norepinephrine use, mechanical ventilation, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) grade, and acute kidney injury (AKI). The CATBoost model demonstrated the best performance: in the training set, it achieved an AUC of 88.9%, sensitivity of 73.2%, specificity of 85.9%, and a Youden index of 0.592; in the test set, it achieved an AUC of 0.887, sensitivity of 75.5%, specificity of 82.3%, and a Youden index of 0.578. Performance fluctuation between the training and test sets was less than 2%, indicating excellent stability. SHAP analysis revealed that pneumonia, norepinephrine use, and mechanical ventilation were the top three features influencing sepsis risk, with pneumonia significantly increasing the risk. DCA results showed that the CATBoost model had the highest net benefit in the high-risk threshold range of 0.2-0.6. Conclusion: The machine learning model developed based on the MIMIC-IV database can effectively predict the risk of sepsis in ICU patients with non-traumatic SAH. It demonstrates good interpretability and clinical utility, providing a basis for clinical risk stratification and precise intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.