ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2024
Colorectal cancer follow-up after surgical resection since the COVID-19 pandemic: first steps towards out-of-hospital follow-up?
Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted outpatient clinic services globally. It is unknown how the pandemic affected the follow-up of surgically treated colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. This population-based study aimed to assess the trends in CRC follow-up consultations before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands. Materials and methods: Nationwide health care activities data between January 2018 and July 2021 were merged with patient-level data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry of stage I-III CRC patients treated with surgical resection. The number of follow-up consultations per patient per year was calculated, and between-group differences were assessed with descriptive statistics. Trends in the number and setting of follow-up consultations were assessed using joinpoint regression analyses. Out-of-hospital follow-up was defined as written, telephone or video consultations. Results: In total, 42 970 CRC patients were included. The median number of follow-up consultations per year per patient was 2.9 (interquartile range: 2.0-4.7). The median number of follow-up consultations increased with disease stage ( Conclusions: This population-based study showed a great increased use of out-of-hospital consultations during CRC follow-up, which predominantly corresponded to the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies should assess whether the use of out-of-hospital follow-up consultations has persisted after the pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.