ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2024
Real-world treatment patterns and challenges of patients with biliary tract cancer: retrospective chart review survey in Europe (GARNET-2).
Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Biomarker-guided immuno-angiogenic therapy in biliary tract cancer: insights from IMbrave151.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Opportunities and Approaches to Optimising Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma Outcomes in the Era of Targeted Therapies: A Narrative Review.Oncology and therapy · 2025Review
- Leveraging Multimodal Foundation Models in Biliary Tract Cancer Research.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs), a heterogeneous group of cancers arising from the biliary tract, account for ∼15% of primary liver cancers. Patients are often diagnosed with advanced disease, resulting in poor prognoses and documented 5-year survival rates of <2%. The aim of this study was to describe real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with advanced BTC in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK. Patients and methods: A retrospective, physician-abstracted chart review survey was conducted between May 2018 and October 2021. Data were abstracted from medical charts of adult patients diagnosed with advanced BTC who initiated treatment with first-line (1L) systemic therapy. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes were summarized descriptively. Results: In total, 196 physicians provided data for 792 advanced BTC patients who initiated 1L systemic therapy. Mean age was 65.7 years and most of the patients were male (62.6%). At data abstraction 56.1% were deceased. The most frequently prescribed 1L systemic treatment was cisplatin-gemcitabine (47.9%). The median 1L treatment duration was 5.3 months. Additionally, 33.5% of patients received 2L and 4.5% received 3L+ treatment. Median real-world overall survival from index date was 13.4 months, with substantial regional variation. Conclusions: This study supports extant data detailing that presentation at an advanced stage may contribute to the poor outcomes of BTC patients. There are significant implications for awareness and guideline-driven pathway changes to improve outcomes for these poorly served patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.