ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2024
Clinical text mining of the performance status and progression-free survival to facilitate data collection in cancer research: an exploratory study.
Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Modern electronic medical records (EMRs) contain a valuable amount of data. These data can be unlocked for research by manual data collection, which is highly labor intensive. Therefore, we explored whether automated text mining (TM) could be used to extract the performance status (PS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in a cohort of 328 non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Materials and methods: Unstructured Dutch text data were derived from different EMR fields containing mainly information recorded during outpatient visits. A rule-based TM approach using regular expressions was used to extract PS and PFS in the R programming language. For PS, quantitative evaluation metrics, such as the weighted F1-score, were used to determine the accuracy of the TM-extracted data. For PFS, the median PFS was compared between the two approaches using the Kaplan-Meier method. In addition, the C-index was determined. Results: A PS was obtained for 196 patients (60%) using the TM approach. In 189 (96%) patients, the TM-curated PS matched the manually curated PS. The weighted F1-score was 96.5%. The median PFS was 7.42 months for the manually curated data ( Conclusions: The developed TM approach is able to extract PS and PFS from the EMR with a very good performance. Therefore, this approach increases the efficiency of reliable data collection from EMRs, facilitating the use of real-world data (RWD) in clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.