Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41648648›Full record

ReviewESMO real world data and digital oncology2024

Artificial intelligence for cancer screening and surveillance.

F Gentile, N Malara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

F GentileDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
N MalaraNanotechnology Research Center, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investing in cancer prevention can be cost-effective. However, this requires significant changes both inside and outside the health care system. The core of the preventive strategy is the assignment of an individual risk level of developing cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI), which has emerged as a tool to reduce errors and confusion in data collection and analysis, has helped accelerate recent advances in identifying circulating markers to generate predictive methods. With predictive models applied to increasingly less invasive and repeatable analytic tests, the risk is no longer assigned but profiled directly on the individual over time. On this basis, the probability of early cancer diagnosis is increased and at the same time, proactive preventive medicine transits from offering lifestyle recommendations to guiding specific treatments to reduce the risk. Despite these promises, AI-based predictive models also present challenges in clinical implementation. Addressing these challenges is crucial to minimizing the future burdens associated with fighting cancer.

Indexed as

AI models in health careAI-powered personalized medicinedata integrityliquid biopsyprediction modelsprediction model validation

Identifiers

PMID41648648
PMCPMC12836662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.