ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2024
Safety and efficacy of encorafenib-cetuximab combination in
Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety and Efficacy of Triple Therapy Containing Encorafenib, Cetuximab, and Binimetinib for BRAF V600E-Mutated Colorectal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Molecular Targeting of EGFR, BRAF, and HER2 Signaling in Colorectal Cancer: Contemporary Advances with Panitumumab, Encorafenib, and Tucatinib.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Real-world outcomes of encorafenib, cetuximab ± binimetinib for BRAF‑mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: the BEETS (JACCRO CC‑18) study.The oncologist · 2026Observational
- Clinical impact of first-line therapeutic strategies in BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: real-world evidence and prognostic insight.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dual blockade therapy encorafenib-cetuximab (EC) was recently established as the standard of care for second- or third-line treatment for Materials and methods: This retrospective study included Results: Eighty-one patients were included after at least 5 months of follow-up before study onset, 50.6% female with a median age of 66.1 years. Overall, 65% of patients debuted with synchronous metastatic disease. Patients received a median of six EC cycles. The median OS and PFS after 9.7 months of follow-up were 12.6 and 5.0 months, respectively. The median DoR was 5.8 months. ORR was 33.8% and DCR was 68.8%. Alkaline phosphatase, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and three or more metastatic lesions were accurate prognostic factors for OS. Additionally, the presence of liver metastases has prognostic value for PFS. The most reported adverse events (AEs) were skin-related toxicities (43.2%). Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 13.5% of patients. Conclusions: Our results align with the BEACON trial results, confirming the safety and efficacy of EC in the RW setting and additionally provide insight about survival prognostic factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.