ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
A cross-center comparison of the relationship between matriline fragmentation, grooming cohesion, and agonistic behavior in captive rhesus macaque (
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A major challenge in managing captive-bred rhesus macaque social groups is mitigating deleterious aggression before it escalates to social instability. Prior work at the California National Primate Research Center (CNPRC) showed that fragmentation of matrilineal structure-reflected in lower average kinship among female kin-is associated with weakened cohesion in grooming networks and higher rates of intense aggression. We tested the generality of these findings by analyzing data from 105 matrilines across 16 social groups at CNPRC and Emory NPRC (ENPRC), which differ in group size, natal male management, and housing. Using generalized linear models, we found that matrilines with lower mean kinship coefficients showed greater grooming fragmentation, even after accounting for network density. Threshold analyses identified a mean kinship of 0.16 as the point at which grooming cohesion declined most consistently across both centers, highlighting a biologically meaningful level of relatedness for maintaining kin-biased social bonds. Patterns of severe aggression differed by target and center: across both centers, matrilines with lower mean kinship directed proportionally more severe aggression toward kin. However, for aggression toward all group members, lower kinship predicted more severe aggression only at ENPRC; at CNPRC, this effect emerged only when natal male aggression was included. Our results demonstrate that mean matrilineal kinship is a robust indicator of family cohesion and latent social instability across management settings. Nepotistic threshold analysis provides a practical tool for managers to identify matrilines at risk for social fragmentation and implement interventions before intra-family aggression emerges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.